found myself convinced about do i really need to know how the material works?.
what is unambiguous to a computer (numbers) may be ambiguous to us (humans).
perception, such as stuff i learnt about colour in icm_experiments_week-9, does not match numerical accuracy. perception may be the working material.
we also spoke about the dichotomy that code requires things in precise expression, but we use it to express things that we cannot otherwise express.
she asked us to recognise the wall — is it boundaries of articulation (writing code), or boundaries of code itself (because of the way it’s made)?
she also asked us to use the course to build theories about why we experience what we experience.
learnt about callbacks: provisions for calling a function when a function is defined previously. it takes the name, so we don’t need to include () as we pass the name of the function. for example, createCallback() has a provision for callback:
createCapture([type], [flipped], [callback])